'Tis Only My Opinion!™
December 2016 - Volume
36, Number 12
Outlook 2017
"The Crystal Ball is Cloudy"
The United States of America is a constitutional republic
The election of Donald J. Trump as President of the U.S. will not
be official until the meeting of the Electoral College at which the
official vote will take place on December 19, 2016. At the moment,
Mr. Trump holds a commanding lead of 306 electoral votes.
In our constitutional republic, the position of President and
Vice-President is determined in the electoral college. A candidate
can win the popular vote and not be elected to the Presidency.
The 2016 election was a shock for liberal elites and many in the
media. They could not fathom how America could possibly vote for Donald J. Trump and shun
the presumptive next President of the United States, Hillary Rodham
Clinton.
Given the polling, predicting a Clinton victory was not
ridiculous. If one trusting nothing but the polling data, a Clinton
electoral college win seemed like a pretty safe bet. But Americans
defied expectations at the polls, and Trump won several “blue”
states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Overall,
Trump carried 3084 counties and Clinton won just 57.
However, both Jill Stein of the Green Party and Hillary Clinton
of the Democratic party and their respective campaigns are trying to
utilize recounts and intimidation to change votes or deny
certification of electors in states like Wisconsin, Michigan and
Delaware from meeting the December 13th date. If the efforts fails
to change the current voting totals, Mr. Trump will become the 45th
President of the United States of America on January 20, 2017.
To many voters, the election of Donald Trump places many of
programs initiated by the Clinton and Obama administrations of the past two decades in
jeopardy.
The Six "D's"
As we stated in the
May
2016 'Opinion newsletter, politicians cannot defeat the
long-term effects of the six "D's", which are Demographics, Defense,
Dollar, Debt, Derivatives and Default.
The incoming Trump administration will be hard-pressed to fund
any of its programs through increasing deficit spending. In FY 2016
the Obama administration acknowledged a deficit of $587 billion yet
the increase in federal debt was $1.422 trillion. Just another
example of how the Ministry of Truth works to obfuscate the real
state of affairs.
Moreover, the stated deficit and the stated
federal debt numbers fail to take into account the off-balance sheet
obligations for which the taxpayers are on the hook for. The
report of the U.S. Government according to GAAP principles for FY
2015 acknowledged that those liabilities were multiples of the
federal debt shown in the above table.
In the latest CFR GAAP report ending as of
September 30, 2015, Treasury Secretary Lew reported that the
discounted value of the federal government's unfunded liabilities
stood in excess of $45 trillion. Of course, the discount rate used
was not disclosed in the report. Some analysts believe that the
non-discounted amount of unfunded liabilities now stands in excess
of $200 trillion.
CBO GAAP FY 2015 stated Unfunded Liabilities of $45 Trillion but no
discount rate given.
At the current time, the Social Security
Disability program is expected to be insolvent in 2022, Medicare in
2030 and Social Security in 2035 according to the House Budget
Committee.
Trumps' Campaign Promises
During the 2016 Presidential campaign, President-Elect Trump made
many promises including:
- Build a Wall between Mexico & the U.S.
- Repeal Obamacare
- Deport Criminal Illegals
- Restructure the Immigration/Guest Worker Program
- Track Visitors and Student Visa's
- Rebuild Infrastructure
- Address Climate Change policies and their impact
- Address Farm Subsidiary programs including CRP and Waterways
- Renegotiate NAFTA
- Reduce Regulatory Burdens
- Reduce the government bureaucracy and increase government
efficiency
- Rebuild and restructure the military
- Restructure social welfare programs including food stamps
- Simplify the tax code
While these campaign promises resonated with the voters, there
are many obstacles that will have to be overcome to implement any of
them as well as finding the funds to implement the programs.
The Challenge Ahead
The House of Representatives according to the Constitution holds
the purse strings. Will the Republican leadership strive to exert
its own vision of change on Trump's programs?
We have already seen an attempt to reinstitute pork-barrel
additions to bills and an effort to balance any new spending with
tax cuts.
Will Congress give the President the Line-Item Veto power?
Current Federal Spending & Debt
The FY 2017 budget submitted by the Obama Administration
projected a stated deficit of $503 billion. Of course, the
federal debt as of the end of FY 2016 as shown above already
exceeded the estimate of $19.3 trillion shown in the budget documents
for end of FY 2017.
The following graph shows that the Obama Administration is
projecting continued accelerating deficits going forward from FY
2016.
It will be up to the Trump Administration to seek to make major
changes to current programs in order to afford any new spending
without a major increase in interest costs. The following charts
shows how the U.S. tax revenue is obtained. As Trump has
proposed reducing income taxes at both the personal and corporate
levels, it would appear that something will have to give.
A prime focus of the Trump campaign was to return manufacturing
jobs back to the United States. The following graph shows the trade
deficit with several countries in 2016. Obviously, the major player
is China and a significant cutback in trade with China will have
many consequences.
Looking Ahead to a Trump Administration
During the last six weeks the lame-duck Obama administration has
served up thousands of pages of regulations and decisions which will
probably be reversed during the first month of the Trump
administration.
The recent election in Italy places the future of the Eurozone
community in question. With the Eurozone showing signs of strain
among its members Straits and with Italy's banking system beginning
to threaten the euros value it is possible that the Eurozone could
be restructured significantly.
Coupled with the recent crackdown on cash by India the outlook for
fiat currencies throughout the world will favor gold investments
going forward.
Following the election of Trump in November there still appears to
be members of the Republican Party as well as the Democratic Party
who have not lined up behind Trump. However, Trump's dominant
personality will be imposed on not just his own Republican Party but
on relations between the US and the world.
With his telephone call to the President of Taiwan Trump has made it
clear that he will take a heavy hand in trade relations with China
which during the past 50 years has enabled China to build up a huge
trade surplus with the United States.
The Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership negotiated by the Obama
administration appears to be dead as Trump has indicated that it
needs to be renegotiated.
Policies that may be addressed
During the past two decades, the federal government has enacted
many laws and regulations that citizens should be concerned about,
for example;
1. The militarization of police;
2. The use of "civil forfeiture procedures" which enable law
enforcement officials to steal citizens cash and property without
any due process of law;
3. The preferential application of law as seen in the handling of
the Clinton foundation activities and the use of a private email
server by Hillary Clinton;
4. The failure of both the SEC and the Federal Reserve to prosecute
any high-level banking executives for their role in the financial
meltdown of the mortgage markets:
5. The elimination of the "To-Big-To-Fail" concept.
6. The attempt by financial authorities to impose a "cashless
society" which would enable the complete financial surveillance of
all transactions and eliminate the economic liberty of all citizens.
The U.S. has not recovered from the 2008 meltdown
The recovery from the financial crisis of 2008 is largely a
mirage. The credit derivatives market stands at about 1.7 times the
level prior to the Lehman crisis if you ignore the reclassification
by the Bank for International Settlements in 2010. According to the
BIS reclassification statistics, total credit derivatives
outstanding as of June 30, 2016 stood at $544.052 trillion which was
down from the peak of $628.003 trillion at the beginning of
2014. Of course, the BIS also says ... don't worry, the
nominal value as of June 30, 2016 only stood at $20.701 trillion.
Of course, nominal only works if everyone is solvent. If
one major player goes up in flames, the whole chain of
derivatives suddenly becomes toxic.
The following chart shows the relatively stable level of the U.S.
money supply including credit derivatives as of June 30, 2016.
Since 2008, the financial and economic data continues to become less
reliable and with all the adjustments and revisions to various
series it is difficult for most of the population to understand what
is really happening to their world. The following graphs from Shadow
Government Statistics of GDP, CPI, and Unemployment illustrate what
happens to data which is revised and subject to all kinds of
adjustments by the Ministry of Truth.
Thoughts on interest rates
As the US and the world stumble toward the next financial crisis.
the Deep State will become desperate to harvest every nickel it can
to rescue itself plus the cast of "systemically important" (Too Big
To Fail) banks and related institutions like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
which are about to once again be left holding colossal bags of
worthless non-performing loans.
The Federal Reserve's interest rate
policies have also reduced the ability of pension funds and
insurance companies to meet their obligations going forward. Most
pension funds and insurance companies rely upon a ladder of bonds to
meet their requirements. Since 2008, the low interest policy of the
FED has resulted in a major decrease in the average earnings from
the bond portfolio of about 3%. This shortfall will require either a
decrease in the payout or an increase in capital requirements by
these institutions.
The Federal Reserve and other central banks will try to unwind
their balance sheets in the "great unwind." However, the unwind will
also have to deal with the huge infrastructure and military buildup
which Trump has indicated he will propose as his term begins.
It is expected that the Federal Reserve will increase the Fed
funds rate currently at 0.25% at its meeting on December 14 by
perhaps as much as 1/2%. As the chart shows, the FED has
supplied almost free money since shortly after the Lehman bankruptcy
in September 2008.
There will be an effect upon the yield of the
10-year U.S. Treasury note but it probably will not push the yield
to the long-term resistance line as shown in the following graph.
However, if the FED continues to raise the Fed Funds rate in 2017,
the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note could move above 4%
and even higher.
With interest rates on the increase, holders of bonds should be
worried about the loss of value in their bond portfolios.
Thoughts on healthcare
One of the more visible failures of the Obama administration was
the passage of Obamacare which created many "unintended
consequences". The majority of the bill was written by lobbyists for
the medical, hospital and pharmaceutical industry. Is it any
wonder that costs have continued to increase?
As a result, healthcare has risen to about 20% of GDP whereas in
many industrialized countries healthcare accounts for between 6 and
10% of GDP. In addition, healthcare consumed about 37% of all
federal spending in fiscal year 2016. The Federal government spent 37%
of every dollar it spent in total on Medicare and Medicaid last
fiscal year. This rate of spending is increasing by roughly 9% a
year.
Within four years the increase will result in
roughly $2 trillion a year of spending on these two programs
alone and blow an additional $600
billion a year hole in the federal budget. For scale, $600
billion is roughly the size of all defense spending and
that's the additional amount we will try to tack onto to
what is already being spent today. This is not due
to people getting older, it is due to medical monopolies that in
any other line of work would land everyone involved in federal
prison under the Clayton and Sherman anti-trust acts.
Much of this difference in costs could be addressed by simply
applying the Clayton and Sherman antitrust acts to the
pharmaceutical, medical and hospital industries.
The ability to cost-compare procedures between hospitals and
doctor's groups has to be implemented. Today, the patient is almost
totally out-of-the-loop in determining the cost. For a citizen to be
charged $24,000 for a procedure that the insurance company only pays
$6,250 is a simply a crime. There is absolutely no justification for
it.
From hospitals, to doctors themselves to pharmaceutical companies
to medical supply houses and even insurance -- all of them are
filled with monopolists, and a monstrous percentage of what each of
these firms and individuals do as it pertains to how charges are
generated, billed and collected
is a clear violation the Sherman and Clayton anti-trust acts.
At the present time, there are many instances where drugs cost 10
times the cost of identical pill in the United States versus the same
cost in Mexico, Canada or elsewhere. Moreover, U.S. citizens are
often arrested if they bring certain medical prescriptions into the
U.S. which they have bought cheaper in other countries.
Pharmaceutical companies charge
their R&D development costs to the United States and the approval
process of the federal drug and administration is often longer and
more expensive than other countries.
Congress should immediately enact a bill to require price
transparency from all healthcare providers, especially doctors and
healthcare organizations like clinics and hospitals.
Individuals should be able to shop to find the best prices for
procedures, exams or any other medical-related procedure and have
access to insurance across state lines.
Thoughts on Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid
The Social Security system is in trouble and most analysts
believe that it will go bankrupt by 2025 if nothing is done. It
should be obvious that Congress under President Lyndon Johnson put a
fire under the Ponzi scheme when it raided the
Social Security Trust Fund to pay for current operating expenses
rather than raising individual and corporate tax rates. Each
subsequent Congress has failed to address the fact that benefits are
simply too extravagant and by adding Medicare and Medicaid promises
have guaranteed the failure of the system.
There is one possible ray of hope ... the fact that life
expectancy might have peaked in 2014 and start to fall as noted in
the recent analysis from the Centers for Disease Control. A
decades-long trend of rising life expectancy in the U.S. could be
ending: It declined last year and it is no better than it was four
years ago.
In most of the years since World War II, life expectancy in the
U.S. has inched up, thanks to medical advances, public health
campaigns and better nutrition and education.
But in 2015 life expectancy slipped, an exceedingly rare event in a year that
did not include a major disease outbreak. Other one-year declines
occurred in 1993, when the nation was in the throes of the AIDS
epidemic, and 1980, the result of an especially nasty flu season. In
2015, rates for 8 of the 10 leading causes of death rose. Even more
troubling to health experts: the U.S. seems to be settling into a
trend of no improvement at all.
In any event, there are only a few ways to attempt to
solve the old age benefit problem. Unfortunately, most of the proposals fail
to acknowledge that the change to robotics will seriously reduce the
number of actual workers who make payments into the system.
There are only a few possible solutions ... all of which come
with a political price to pay including.
1. Raise age to receive benefits
2. Reduction of benefits as AGI increases
3. Requalify all receiving disability benefits every five years.
4. Tax all benefits as ordinary income.
Thoughts on Welfare
The growth of the welfare system in the U.S. should be of concern
to all. Since the end of WWII, the growth of the welfare
system and the trend to a dependency society has accelerated.
In FY 2016 total US government spending on welfare — federal,
state, and local — was “guesstimated”
to be $1,032 billion, including $591 billion for
Medicaid, and $467 billion in other welfare.
Welfare spending, on programs for relief,
unemployment compensation, and income support, started out at the
beginning of the 20th century at 0.1% of Gross Domestic
Product (GDP). It was not until the crisis of the Great Depression
that welfare expenditures began their secular rise, reaching 2.1% of GDP by 1940.
During World War II, welfare expenditures
declined to about 1% of GDP per year, and fluctuated
between 1 and 2% per year, depending on the business
cycle. Health care expenditure amounted to about 1% of GDP.
By the early 1960s, welfare cost about 2% of GDP.
The Great Society programs started welfare on
an upward path, so that after 1980 welfare spending fluctuated
between 3 and 4% of GDP, spiking during recessions.
In 1996 President Clinton signed a reform of
welfare, and welfare costs declined from 3.4% of GDP during
the 1990-91 recession to a low of 2.4%of GDP in 2000.
In the 2001-02 recession welfare costs
increased to 3.1% of GDP in 2003 and then declined to 2.5% of GDP by 2007. But the Great Recession of 2009-10 produced
an explosion in welfare costs to a peak of 4.75% of GDP in
2010. Welfare costs are expected to decline to 2.66% of GDP
by 2015 and down to 2.4% of GDP by 2020.
The Food Stamp program has grown significantly since its
inception as shown in the following chart and in FY 2015 cost $70
billion.
The Aid to Dependent Children program and its successor, TANF,
have effectively destroyed the nuclear family of the
African-American community. Even today, many welfare recipients face
loss of income if they work.
Immediate Steps to be Taken
On the day after inauguration, President Trump without any
further Congressional approval can:
- Approve the North Dakota pipeline
- Approve the Keystone XL pipeline
- Void many Obama Executive orders
- Order a review of all regulations passed in the last 90 days
- Revoke the Iranian Nuclear Deal
- Revoke the Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement
- Revoke the Paris Agreement on Climate Change
- Begin to build the Mexican Border Fence
- Rework NATO financing
- Rework U.N. financing
- Increase staffing of Immigration Courts
- Cease any funding to a city and/or county offering sanctuary
to illegal immigrants and arrest local officials for violating
federal law.
That should shake up the status-quo.
But then - 'Tis Only My Opinion!
Fred Richards
December 26, 2016
www.adrich.com
www.strategicinvesting.com
Corruptisima republica plurimae leges. [The
more corrupt a republic, the more laws.] -- Tacitus, Annals III 27
'Tis
only My Opinion! Archive Menu, click here.
This
issue of 'Tis Only My Opinion was copyrighted by Strategic Investing in 2016.
All rights reserved. Quotation with attribution is encouraged.
'Tis Only My Opinion is intended to provoke thinking, then dialogue among our
readers.
|