'Tis Only My Opinion!™
September 2015 - Volume
35, Number 9
"The Fruits of Compassion"
From the first European immigrants who arrived on the North
American continent on the Mayflower and those who came later prior
to founding of the United States of America in 1776, the vast
majority professed to be of the Christian faith. For the first
century and a half within the U.S., the vast majority of the
population entered the country legally and soon became citizens.
As a result, it is not surprising to find references to God and
religious freedom in the founding documents of the United States of
America.
One of the basic foundations of the Christian faith is compassion
towards all people. One of the results of that compassion has
been that the United States has become a melting pot of various
nationalities and religions.
The Statute of Liberty was a gift of friendship from the people
of France to the United States. Inscribed on the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor
which was dedicated in October 28, 1888 are the
following words:
"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses
yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp
beside the golden door! "
At
the time the Statue of Liberty was dedicated, the United States was a
country largely undeveloped with citizens willing to be independent.
Those immigrants were assimilated into a country with ideals
significantly different than those of the country from which they
had arrived.
The Disappearance of Self-Reliance and God
Since the founding of this nation, the early concepts of
self-reliance and a God-fearing nation have slowly disappeared as
the notion of Christian compassion towards those less fortunate has gained
political traction.
The pace of destruction of those early concepts has significantly
increased beginning with Roosevelt's "New Deal" programs in the
1930's. With the passage of the Social Security Act of 1934,
the idea that the government could provide a modicum of security in
old age took root.
During the following decades, programs like disability,
childcare, unemployment, employment training programs, school lunch
programs, childcare, aid-to-dependent children, etc. were
implemented.
New American Way of Life
Over time, laws were enacted which for a large portion of the
population destroyed the concept of self-reliance, self
responsibility, and the traditional nuclear family.
As a result, there is a new "American Way of Life." It has
significant implications for the nation and the way forward. John
Tabb recently wrote in The Lonely Libertarian the following article:
New American Way of Life
The new American way of life ... Get on
board ...
For a guy and his girlfriend with two
kids, all you have to do is follow these proven steps:
-
Don't marry her!
-
Always use your mom's address to get
your mail.
-
The guy buys a house.
-
The guy rents out house to his
girlfriend with his two kids.
-
Section 8 will pay $900 a month for
a 3 bedroom home.
-
Girlfriend signs up for Obamacare, so
guy doesn't have to pay for family insurance.
-
Girlfriend gets to go to college for
free beings a single mother.
-
Girlfriend gets $600 a month for food
stamps.
-
Girlfriend gets a free cell phone.
-
Girlfriend gets free utilities.
-
Guy moves into home, but continues to
use mom's address for his mail.
-
Girlfriend claims one kid and guy
claims the other kid on their tax forms. Now both get to
claim head-of-household at $1,800 credit.
-
Girlfriend gets $1,800 a month
disability for being "crazy" or having a "bad back" and
never has to work again.
This plan is perfectly legal and is
executed now by millions of people.
A married couple with a stay-at-home mom
yields $0 dollars.
An unmarried couple with stay-at-home mom
nets $21,600 disability + $10,800 free housing + 6,000 free
Obamacare + 6,000 free food + $4,800 free utilities + $6,000
Pell grant money to spend + $12,000 a year in college tuition
from Pell grant + $8,800 tax benefit for being a single mother =
$75,000 a year in benefits.
Any idea why the country is $18 trillion
plus in debt and half the population is sitting around letting
the other half pay their way?
Maybe this is a good reason to clean
house in Washington in 2016!
The Law of Unintended Consequences
Compassion has a lot of side-effects that are not immediately
visible.
Tapp's article illustrates how a series of
compassionate programs morphs into something far different that that
which was originally envisioned.
This is particularly true whenever
an organization or government gets involved. The concept of a sunset
provision is rarely invoked as the size of a organization or the
amount of money involved is important to the leaders or patrons of
the program.
Aid-to-Dependent Children and the rise of illegitimate births.
The federal government along with state governments began to
provide assistance to single mothers with children beginning in the
1920's. With the passage of Social Security in 1933, the
effort was expanded and the amount of funds expended began to
significantly increase.
The Aid-to-Dependent Children laws and regulations have been
instrumental in the breakdown of the family not only within the
African-American community but many groups living at or near the
poverty level.
Economics professor Walter E. Williams writes:
"According to the 1938
Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences,
that year 11 percent of black children and 3 percent of white
children were born to unwed mothers."
In 2013, more than four in ten births
(40.6%) were to unmarried women whereas in 1960 less than 5.3% were
to unmarried women as shown in the following chart.
While the destruction of the nuclear family is obvious when
looking at the above chart, the fact that 71.5% of all births in
non-Hispanic blacks is now above 70% is particularly devastating to
the African-American community.
In 1965 a policy paper written by George A. Akerlof and Janet L.
Yellen entitled "Births in the United States" stated:
"In 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white
infants were born to single mothers."
It is hard not to argue that the welfare system along with
changing moral attitudes has played a significant role in
these changes. The current War on Drugs is also partially to blame
as a substantial portion of the African-American male population has
been incarcerated during the past 50 years.
Illegal Immigration
One of the hot buttons in the 2016 Presidential campaign concerns
the invasion of the U.S. by illegal immigrants as well refugees
being admitted to the country from all over the world. The cost to
the U.S. taxpayers is hardly ever discussed, let alone quantified.
It was only in 1875 that immigration into the U.S. became a
federal matter. In 1891, the federal government organized the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services department. In 1921, following
24 million immigrants arriving in the U.S. between 1900 and 1920, a
quota system was implemented.
Interpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court as to
"anchor babies" being granted citizenship has led to the rise of
many pregnant women from China, Mexico and other areas arriving in
the U.S. to give birth.
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor
babies because
under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the
illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into
permanent U.S. residency.
The cost of "anchor babies" to the U.S. taxpayer is significant.
Medicaid alone paid $2.2 billion in 2014 to partially reimburse
hospitals for unpaid illegal alien delivery bills. A staggering 84
hospitals in California alone, have been forced to close their doors
because of unpaid bills by illegal aliens. In 2014, in
Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, a staggering 70% of all babies
born are to illegal aliens.
It is reported that many Chinese are paying between $20,000 to
$60,000 to visit the U.S. to obtain "anchor baby" status.
The cost to society is substantial if as several studies show the
cost to raise a child is in excess of $300,000.
If the family lives on welfare, guess who picks up the
tab?
"Birthright citizenship" for illegal aliens abuses taxpayers by
granting a lifetime of welfare and social services to the "anchor
baby" and its entire family structure.
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, 71 percent of
illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39
percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants
generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children,
to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born
children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools,
health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely
pay taxes.
The media and members of various political organizations continue to inform the public that the number of
illegals in the U.S. is about 12 million despite the two previous
amnesty programs primarily using the data from a Pew Research Center
study.
It should be noted that the Pew Research Center might not be
considered to be totally objective.
In August 2015,
Mexico’s former ambassador to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan,
said that 30 million “undocumented immigrants” are living in the United States in the
beginning of an interview before later stating a different number at
the conclusion.
Was Sarukhan correct? Does anyone really know?
The U.S. has immigration laws which both Democratic and Republic
administrations have not enforced effectively. Legal
immigrants are faced with years of delay and in many cases,
thousands of dollars in legal fees. The system is broken by almost
any definition.
It has a visitor-visa program which does not keep track of
those overstaying their visas and only puts minimal effort into
finding visitors who do not exit the country. It fails to
monitor students who are attending colleges and/or universities in
the U.S. It is simply too easy to disappear from school as
there is no effective way to determine if they are in attendance.
Refugee Resettlement
Citing humanitarian concerns, the federal government has for
years helped refugees from disaster areas and people displaced by
wars to be resettled in the U.S.
Following the admission of over 250,000 displaced Europeans in the
wake of World War II, the first refugee legislation enacted by the
U.S. Congress was the "Displaced Persons Act of 1948."
This legislation provided for the admission of an additional 400,000
displaced Europeans. Later laws allowed for the admission of persons fleeing Communist regimes. In
1975, the U.S. resettled hundreds of thousands of Indochinese
refugees.
The Refugee Act of 1980 is the current legal
basis for the program and since 1975, the U.S. has resettled over 3
million refugees here.
In many cases, the refugees
are placed in areas in which they have no support mechanisms other
than that provided by the federal government; Recently, many
rural areas of the country have begun to object strenuously to the
resettlement of refugees.
In many places such as Minneapolis, Minnesota and Flint,
Michigan, the refugees have created areas, or whole cities, that no
longer abide by U.S. laws but are governed by Sharia laws.
President Obama promised to "change America." However, the
voting public, probably, did not envision the extent of the changes
which has occurred.
Amnesty
In 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) signed by
Ronald Reagan, Republican, marked the biggest change in U.S.
immigration policy in decades. IRCA granted amnesty to undocumented
immigrants who met specific provisions, required employers to verify
workers' eligibility to work legally, and increased funding for the
Border Patrol. About 2.7 million individuals, including over 2
million Mexicans, were granted amnesty under IRCA.
In 2001, President George W. Bush attempted to address the
immigration issue, particularly, the movement of Mexican workers
into the United States, both legally and illegally. After
seven years, Bush's attempt to change immigration policies failed.
President Obama has taken another approach by issuing executive
orders and directives to Homeland Security and the Border Patrol to
not enforce certain U.S. laws ... thus, creating the "Dreamers Act"
and failing to remove illegals from the country.
The Right to Vote
As the 2016 elections approach, a substantial portion of the
population is concerned that electronic voting machines are not
tamper-proof. Moreover, whether a person is really eligible to vote
is also in question.
It seems ridiculous to argue that we need a state-approved
identification to obtain entrance to many venues but not to vote but
that is the position of many politicians.
We don't really verify the voting rolls via the social-security
death index nor run a check against any public-utility database to
check addresses, etc.
I wonder why?
Conclusion
When politicians do not require that laws be enforced, revised or
removed when out-dated, anarchy
is just around the corner.
What makes Donald Trump effective is that he understands that the
"silent majority" no longer believes that either political party can
effectively rule without significant change within those
organizations.
Both parties have become corrupt and there is little difference.
The Supreme Court is allowed to change the interpretation of
words at will.
The bureaucracy is out-of-control and Congress is unable, or
unwilling, to use the power of the purse to regain control of it.
As a result, what started out as a compassionate response to a
need has created forces which will ultimately destroy the basic
building blocks of this country.
But then - 'Tis Only My Opinion!
Fred Richards
September 6, 2015
www.adrich.com
www.strategicinvesting.com
Corruptisima republica plurimae leges. [The
more corrupt a republic, the more laws.] -- Tacitus, Annals III 27
'Tis
only My Opinion! Archive Menu, click here.
This
issue of 'Tis Only My Opinion was copyrighted by Strategic Investing in 2015.
All rights reserved. Quotation with attribution is encouraged.
'Tis Only My Opinion is intended to provoke thinking, then dialogue among our
readers.
|